Black Male Hairstyle - Necole Bitchie.com: Does Losing the Weave Mean Losing Him? |
Necole Bitchie.com: Does Losing the Weave Mean Losing Him? Posted: 04 Apr 2014 08:37 AM PDT For some women, their weave and the ability to be versatile with their hair is one of their biggest accessories, but what happens when she decides to ditch the weave and go natural but her man isn't feeling it? Whether you're rocking an afro, twist out, or 16-inch Malaysian remy yaky, your man should always make you feel like the most beautiful woman in the world, but what happens when your natural beauty just isn't cutting it for him? This week, Steve Harvey tackled the issue when he invited married couple McClea and Love to his show after Love sent in a video saying that when she decided to ditch her long, silky weave, her husband didn't find her natural hair attractive. Love looked adorable with her cute little puff 'fro, but as much as McClea kept saying his wife is a beautiful woman, he just couldn't get with the natural hair program. Check out some excerpts:
CurlyNikki's very own Nikki Walton stepped in as the natural hair expert, saying that hair is so intimately tied to self-image that when weaves come off, women are literally stripping away their confidence. She told Love that once she builds up her own confidence, experiments a little and tries some new looks, she'll feel better about herself and her husband can't help but be attracted to that.
Watch below: Ladies, if you wore weave and decided that you wanted to take it out and rock your hair natural, but your man wasn't feeling it, would you keep the weave or risk losing him? |
The U.S. Army's Racially Biased <b>Hairstyle</b> Guidelines - Hit & Run <b>...</b> Posted: 04 Apr 2014 09:38 AM PDT
In a move that's being labeled racially biased and nonsensical, the U.S. Army has nixed cornrows, twists, and multiple braids wider than a quarter-inch for female members. These now-prohibited hairstyles aren't just disproportionately favored by African Americans, they're some of the best options black women have for keeping hair both natural and unobtrusive while in the field. "Natural," in this context, means hair that's not been chemically relaxed, straightened, or permed. Natural hairstyles are much easier to maintain than more processed dos, obviously an important consideration for women in the military. An Army spokesman told the Washington Post the regulations are "necessary to maintain uniformity within a military population." But that uniformity seems to come at the expense of military women of color. "Most black women, their hair doesn't grow straight down, it grows out," said Sgt. Jasmine Jacobs, of the Georgia National Guard, who wears her hair in two twists (hair that "exceeds more than 2" from scalp" is also banned). "I'm disappointed to see the Army, rather than inform themselves on how black people wear their hair, they've white-washed it all." Jacobs launched a petition asking the Army to reconsider, which so far has gathered more than 11,500 signatures. "More than 30% of females serving in the military are of a race other than white," the petition notes. Yet the "lack of regard for ethnic hair" in the new regulations is apparent.
As you can see, the guidelines get incredibly specific. Aside from potential racial bias, they also just seem needlessly detailed. Other prohibited hair moves include having more than one inch difference in length between front and back of hair, wearing a scrunchie that clashes with hair color, and parts that are not in a straight line. I understand the need for the army to issue broad guidelines on acceptable hair styles, as it does in other areas of appearance. But, beyond that, it could be left up to individual unit commanders. The current regulations do include a waiver system, under which women can appeal and be granted exceptions on a case by case basis. Why not start from a place of allowing women and their immediate supervisors to make those determinations? Surely people smart and capable enough to fight and die for our country are smart and capable enough to assess for themselves which hairstyles are an interference and which aren't. Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a staff editor at Reason.com. |
You are subscribed to email updates from black male hair styles - Google Blog Search To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment